Is it not then the case, keeping in mind what the gentlewoman from Connecticut just outlined, that fundamentally what they are trying to do with the debt limit hike here is attach their tax cut for the wealthy and tax credits with respect to child care, if that is what they have in mind, which does not address either the short-term or the long-term needs with respect to child care, and if anything, is just the down payment on more indebtedness? So if we are to deal with the debt limit hike in and of itself, that is one thing, but if we are to deal with these other issues and attach it to it, is it not the gentleman's position, as it certainly is mine, that any attempt to attach a phony tax credit bill or some kind of tax giveaway is inimical to solving the debt limit problem, and in fact, will work against the best interests of the United States?
Neil Abercrombie: “Is it not then the case, keeping in mind what the gentlewoman from Connecticut just outlined, that fundamentally what…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of attaching tax cuts to the debt limit hike.
Share
More from Neil Abercrombie
What I am asking is could you at least contemplate the idea that H.R. 2314 has no basis in racial politics but is, in fact, a document put together to try to resolve legislatively the questions of dealing with Native Hawaiian assets as…
in terms of popular sovereignty, it is well established that the Office of Hawaiian Affairs has had the approbation of the voting population in Hawaii pre-Rice v. Cayetano and post-Rice v. Cayetano.
I am deeply touched by your remarks. Your friendship is something I treasure and value. I am so taken by it, as a matter of fact, that I wonder if you would allow me to present you with a token of my esteem and my regard for you. These…
If it is, then why are we giving racial preferences in countless numbers of Congressional enactments and laws as well as Supreme Court decision recognizing the special relationship, the trust responsibility that Congress has under the…





