Let's take a pretty straightforward example. Let's say that we wanted to reduce taxes. By the way, we can acknowledge there is a debate about whether reducing taxes does, in fact, generate revenue or not. But for these purposes and especially the recent large tax cut, we simply did not see a return on revenues from those tax cuts. But let's just stick with the fact that if we reduce taxes, then we have to either increase another tax and/or reduce government spending somewhere to be able to have a budget-neutral, a deficit-neutral outcome. Is that correct? Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Utah. Mr. McADAMS. That is right. Every activity, whether it is reducing revenues or increasing spending, should be neutral as it relates to the Federal deficit.
Share
More from Ed Case
Aloha to everybody. And I join my colleagues up here in saying a very special mahalo to each and all of you for coming here today.
I really appreciate my colleagues spending the time here tonight. Now, I will go back and add a little bit of detail, so that we can fully illustrate what the issue is, how we got here, what the consequences are, why we need to do…
First of all, let's take a look at the actual language of the amendment. I have heard the arguments from my colleague about what this amendment does, but when you take a look at the actual language of the amendment, what you discover is…
I thank so much my colleague for his leadership, as well. I really appreciate his highlighting the intergenerational consequences of not solving this issue today. Mr. Speaker, may I inquire as to the time remaining. The SPEAKER pro…





