As appropriators, I believe it is the only prudent process that we can follow to at least advise ourselves and our colleagues as to what can be reasonably and rationally anticipated if we are to take this important step. When NATO was originally organized, I doubt if Members of Congress had any inkling of what the costs would be to the taxpayers of the United States. Whether you are for it or against it, I think it would be well that we enter into this new phase and very important phase with our eyes open.
Daniel Inouye: “As appropriators, I believe it is the only prudent process that we can follow to at least advise ourselves and our…”
On the recordJuly 14, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of NATO expansion during a Senate appropriations debate.
Share
More from Daniel Inouye
Apr 28, 2015
In 2009, the late Senator Daniel K. Inouye... supported simple and unconditional bill language like that in S. 248
Jul 25, 2017
The Department affects almost all sectors of our Nation's economy and literally touches all of our lives.
Apr 2, 2019
It is and has always been Federal law and policy that Indian tribes recognized by the Federal Government stand on an equal footing to each other and to the Federal Government.
May 31, 2022
I strongly urge that the Committee take action to assure that laws relating to Native American languages not only include Native Hawaiians in their wording, but also include Native Hawaiians as actual beneficiaries.





