it is with some considerable reluctance that I rise today to speak in opposition to the amendment proposed by my good friend, the senior Senator from Connecticut, that would prohibit the expenditure of funds for the operations of the Branch of Acknowledgment until the Secretary of the Interior has certified to the Congress that certain administrative procedures have been implemented with respect to the consideration of any petition submitted to the Secretary. The provisions of this amendment are drawn from an authorizing bill, S. 1392, that is now pending in the Committee on Indian Affairs. At Senator Dodd's request, in July of this year I agreed to schedule a hearing on S. 1392. That hearing is to be held on Tuesday, September 17. As chairman of the Committee on Indian Affairs, I believe that Senator Dodd's request for a hearing in the authorizing committee reflects a position on which we can both agree that the appropriate venue for the consideration of reforms to the Branch of Acknowledgment process is in the authorizing committee of jurisdiction.
Daniel Inouye: “it is with some considerable reluctance that I rise today to speak in opposition to the amendment proposed by my good…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to the Branch of Acknowledgment during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Daniel Inouye
it is and has always been Federal law and policy that Indian tribes recognized by the Federal Government stand on an equal footing to each other and to the Federal Government.
Who was one of my great inspirations for this diplomatic approach? Because we have a choice.
By allowing the DREAM Act to sit idle, we extinguish hope for a lot of people and deny too many the opportunity I was given.
I believe the record should show how much we appreciate the work of the distinguished Senator from Mississippi, the vice chairman of the committee, Thad Cochran. We have demonstrated to our colleagues that bipartisanship works in this…





