This motion to recommit purports to set discretionary spending at fiscal year 2011 levels for these three bills. But this motion is extremely misleading because increased mandatory spending included in the three bills--they are not touching that. Agriculture alone would see a $7 billion cut due to increases in mandatory programs. If we include the emergency disaster relief, it would force an additional cut of $3.2 billion. The measure before us is within our 302(b) allocation scored by the CBO and the Senate Budget Committee, and it meets every requirement of the Budget Control Act. I strongly urge a ``no'' vote.
Share
More from Daniel Inouye
. . . If [the FCC] identifies such unforeseen instances in which a lack of agreement results in a loss of local programming to viewers, the Commission should take the regulatory steps needed to address the problem.
He told us that in his view, all tribes have a prepaid health plan, and that it was paid for by our ancestors who ceded their lands to the United States.
above my desk in Washington is a copy of the labor contract that was signed by my grandfather, Asakichi Inouye, in July 1899. In the agreement, my grandfather would be paid $15 a month to work at the McBryde Sugar Company on the Island of…
it is and has always been Federal law and policy that Indian tribes recognized by the Federal Government stand on an equal footing to each other and to the Federal Government.





