On the recordMay 27, 2021
a couple of points. On taking 55.3 acres into trust, this is not like the Federal Government is going to have new land management responsibilities. This is a matter of principle for the Senator from Utah, and I recognize that; that he thinks, basically, no additional land should be taken into trust, even though this government-to-government relationship--this authority over these government relationships are enshrined in the Constitution of the United States and this government-to-government relationship has already been established by statutory law and the process for putting land into trust is already a well-established pathway. But what the Senator from Utah is saying is no more or we are going to have to do a one-for-one swap or even sometimes a two-for-one swap. You cannot have a net increase in the acreage, even if it is 53 acres, even if there is an established process. And so, I do find that difficult to work with. I know that the Senators from Arizona are in discussions with the Senator from Utah. We will find our way forward. This is 53 acres. It is important, obviously. We are going to enact this legislation. I like the Senator from Utah. We will find a way on this one. But if he would entertain an amendment to the request, then I would be pleased to pass the RESPECT Act by voice vote, if that is something that the Senator from Utah would be amenable to. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Utah.





