Mr. President, just to point out, this amendment only applies to surface transportation, Amtrak and passenger rail in particular. I think it is counterproductive. I understand the point that the Senator from Ohio is making. But the problem right now--look, I don't think President Biden or the head of Amtrak or Secretary Buttigieg or anyone else is, at all, planning to implement any kind of mask mandate in the foreseeable future. But he said something that I agree with, which is that COVID is going to be with us for the foreseeable future and there will be new variants. And if it looks the same, it looks same. But if it is, say, 10 times as virulent, 100 times as deadly and airborne, then I do think public health officials should be able to consult with Agencies to try to figure out what measures ought to work. And for those reasons, I oppose this amendment. Vote on Amendment No. 1210 The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the amendment.
On the recordOctober 25, 2023
Source
govinfo.govShare & report
More from Brian Schatz
Feb 5, 2025
They would get--I was about to swear. It is the Senate floor. I will not. But they would get canned. They would get immediately sacked.
Feb 5, 2025
Well, and just to be clear, they don't even have their e- mail accounts working, so think about that. First of all, it is a little weird to send people home and say, We are still operational, and then they can't even get their dot-aid…
Feb 5, 2025
It is not changing laws regarding disaster preparedness or infrastructure; it is changing laws on voter ID.
Feb 5, 2025
That is one of the things I have noticed about this President is just the unapologetic ``I have leverage, and I am going to use it'' aspect of it and nobody bats an eyelash. If you behaved like that, you would get lit on fire…





