in closing, I want to say, as Mr. Welch stated, ANWR, everybody keeps talking about ANWR. But if you opened ANWR today, you would not get any energy production tomorrow. You wouldn't get any for a decade or more. Whereas right now, the oil companies have 68 million acres of land available for development, and they are not exploiting them. I don't care how much rhetoric goes on here today, there is still the 68 billion acres of land available for development. They have access to enough acreage to produce six times the amount of energy that we might get from ANWR. So again, I'll repeat over and over, 'use it or lose it.' I urge support for House Resolution 1247.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing energy production and land use in relation to ANWR during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Madeleine Bordallo
This proposal amends the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act and the Dingell-Johnson Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act to allow United States territories and the District of Columbia to enjoy equal funding considerations for…
Today I introduce the IDEA Parity for Outlying Areas Act, which would amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to better support students with disabilities in our smaller U.S. territories and the Freely Associated States…
We should all be smiling when we say we support this bill--and that is no laughing matter. Mr. Chairman, I have no further speakers, and I yield back the balance of my time. Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, I would ask for adoption of the…





