I rise reluctantly to oppose the Frank amendment. Cutting the 1995 defense budget by $2.5 billion, as proposed in the amendment, cannot be made without serious disruptions. The demands on the Department of Defense for peacekeeping, disaster relief, environmental cleanup continue to increase while defense resources decrease, exacerbating the impact of any additional cut to defense. There are no easy cuts left. The choice is either to cripple readiness or debilitate the modernization program. Maintaining readiness of our forces is the first priority, and we have got to maintain it. I submit that we must oppose the Frank amendment.
Sanford Bishop: “I rise reluctantly to oppose the Frank amendment. Cutting the 1995 defense budget by $2.5 billion, as proposed in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Frank amendment to cut the 1995 defense budget during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Sanford Bishop
I thank the gentleman for those words. Mrs. Rosalynn Carter did so much in her lifetime, and she held many leadership positions throughout it. She received numerous awards and recognitions for her work. She served as the honorary…
But I am more concerned with the general income levels that prevent service members, particularly low-ranking members, from being able to do that.
May I inquire as to how much time is remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Georgia has 24 minutes remaining.
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise as the sponsor of H.R. 9600, legislation to designate the United States Postal facility in Plains, Georgia, as the Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Post Office. President Jimmy Carter and…





