I respect very, very deeply our Constitution and our First Amendment, but I share the gentleman's concern with the interpretations that have been given of the First Amendment over the last 30 years by our Supreme Court. Ironically, it seems that the Founding Fathers who certainly had the specter of a national religion fresh on their minds probably never, ever envisioned a time in history like we experience today when religious expression and exercise of any kind in a public place is shunned so adamantly by our government. They were running from a government that was too involved in religion, and we now have a government that discriminates against religion. So I want to commend the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Istook) for his efforts and for lifting up this issue for the American people and for the Members of this body to carefully deliberate on so that we can really consider where we want to go in the future to right what has been 30 years of the wrong direction.
Sanford Bishop: “I respect very, very deeply our Constitution and our First Amendment, but I share the gentleman's concern with the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the interpretation of the First Amendment and religious expression in public.
Share
More from Sanford Bishop
I certainly rise in opposition to this amendment. The amendment would reduce funding for the Foreign Agriculture Service, which reduces the services promoting United States agricultural exports, developing overseas markets, and increasing…
Let's stop playing politics, and just face reality, and let us move ahead as we should.
I thank the gentleman for his remarks. I yield to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Loudermilk) of Georgia's 11th District.
It is with a heavy heart and solemn remembrance that I rise today to honor the life and legacy of a former First Lady of the United States, a former First Lady of the State of Georgia, a great wife, a loving mother, a doting grandmother…





