I appreciate that follow up. The gentleman knows of what he speaks and I'm just still perplexed as to why, without a legal opinion, all of a sudden someone comes up with the wisdom that it's beyond the scope.
Bishop questions the sudden change in interpretation regarding project scope.
Share & report
More from Sanford Bishop
Mr. Chairman, I think it is interesting to hear the discussion about a $2 trillion deficit when that was created by the tax cut that they passed in the last administration--$2 trillion because they cut the taxes and reduced the amount of…
Mr. Chair, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment. The amendment would cut funding for the Office of the Chief Economist by an additional 46 percent. That is almost half. The Office of the Chief Economist provides advice and counsel…
Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment. It will cut funding for the Natural Agricultural Statistics Service and the Census of Agriculture by an additional 8 percent. This bill already cuts too much funding from USDA…
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chairman, let me just say that we are in this deficit situation largely because we don't collect the revenue from the people who owe taxes, the wealthy millionaires and…
Other voices in this conversation
