I would agree with the gentleman from Florida. The Army does have sufficient funds in bid savings and in unobligated balances from prior military construction appropriations to undertake a $3.6 million project. I would be happy to work with the gentleman to see if the Army would use those existing funds on this project.
Share
More from Sanford Bishop
I certainly rise in opposition to this amendment. The amendment would reduce funding for the Foreign Agriculture Service, which reduces the services promoting United States agricultural exports, developing overseas markets, and increasing…
Last year, the RAND National Defense Research Institute revealed that 25.8 percent of active-duty members face food insecurity.
Let's stop playing politics, and just face reality, and let us move ahead as we should.
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Colorado will be postponed. Amendment No. 80 Offered by Mr. Self The Acting CHAIR. It is…
Other voices in this conversation
