So it is really not the President's sequester, it is the responsibility that the--or the mandate that the congress has placed upon the executive branch to implement these cuts, these painful cuts, the cuts that may very well cause some real problems for the consuming public.
Editor's note · Context
Bishop clarifies that the sequester is a congressional mandate, not solely the President's decision.
Share
More from Sanford Bishop
Last year, the RAND National Defense Research Institute revealed that 25.8 percent of active-duty members face food insecurity.
I certainly rise in opposition to this amendment. The amendment would reduce funding for the Foreign Agriculture Service, which reduces the services promoting United States agricultural exports, developing overseas markets, and increasing…
I urge at least $40 million for the National Park Service Tribal Historic Preservation Program.
I am proud to rise in support of the Beagle Brigade Act, which is a bipartisan, bicameral bill, the companion of which I led in this Chamber with my colleagues Representatives Drew Ferguson, Dan Kildee, and Adrian Smith. The Senate…





