I think that the concerns raised by the gentleman in offering the amendment are perhaps well taken from time to time. But I think this amendment is punitive. I think it is counterproductive. And I think it is going to make it much more difficult to get the results that the gentleman is seeking. Because of that, I think that the amendment should be defeated. It is a bad amendment. And I think it would be bad for morale for the Department. And I think it would be bad generally for the public. I urge opposition and a ``no'' vote on this amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. Roe). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment Offered by Mr. Pocan
Sanford Bishop: “I think that the concerns raised by the gentleman in offering the amendment are perhaps well taken from time to time.…”
Share
More from Sanford Bishop
Let's stop playing politics, and just face reality, and let us move ahead as we should.
Government subsidies, again, always controversial, but in both of your written testimonies, you potentially suggested farmers are going to need some kind of economic assistance.
According to the February 2024 farm income forecast, government payments such as the conservation payments near a margin curve, which are the farm bill commodity payments and the supplemental disaster relief are forecast to fall $10.2…
I support passage of this six- bill package, including the section on Agriculture-Rural Development- FDA. The ag bill affects the lives of every single American--rural, urban, and suburban--every single day and ensures that Americans have…





