Frankly, as painful as it is to make these kind of choices, I think the choices are long overdue in terms of our fiscal picture. I am pleased that the Senator from New Mexico has offered this amendment for really two principal reasons: First, under the budget resolution, President Clinton's fiscal year 1995 to 1999 defense budget would almost certainly face very significant and, in my view, very harmful reductions if we leave this budget resolution as it is. Second, this budget resolution does not seriously address the real culprit in our deficit picture, which is the runaway growth on mandatory or entitlement programs. The budget resolution before the Senate today reduces the cap on total discretionary spending by $43 billion in budget authority and $26 billion in outlays over the next 5 years. This includes a reduction of $5.3 billion in budget authorities and $1.8 billion in outlays this year.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the budget resolution on defense spending and entitlement programs.
Share
More from Samuel Nunn
I appreciate his steadfast support of national security. He has made that record over and over and over again. I do not agree with him in terms of the implications of the Grassley-Exon amendment, because I have watched the Appropriations…
Yesterday the Nation lost a true hero, Lewis B. Puller, Jr.--a combat veteran of Vietnam. The dramatic story of Lew's life is movingly told in his Pulitzer Prize winning book, ``Fortunate Son.'' The story of his experiences in Vietnam, his…
I do not think I will require a whole lot of time, but I rise in support of the Robb amendment. Mr. President, I had hoped we would not reach the stage where we really were attempting--and it certainly may not pass, but at least there is…
our committee spends an extensive amount of time reviewing nominations on the issue of accountability. Our actions in the Tailhook matter are a prime example. All Navy and Marine Corps nominations were held up by our committee. The Senator…





