This amendment would limit the ability of the prevailing party to receive reasonable attorneys' fees for services rendered in connection with a settlement agreement. Where citizens, through a private enforcement action, hold the government or a private party accountable, Congress has authorized payments for reasonable attorneys' fees. Bringing meritorious claims to hold corporate wrongdoing accountable is often time consuming and expensive. In many cases, Congress has already authorized reasonable attorneys' fees specifically to encourage these types of lawsuits to ensure a level playing field and an accessible justice system. This amendment would limit these fees to outdated rates--$125 an hour; that is ridiculous--and that will discourage citizens from bringing these important lawsuits. Accordingly, I encourage my colleagues to oppose this amendment. I yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte), the chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary.
Hank Johnson: “This amendment would limit the ability of the prevailing party to receive reasonable attorneys' fees for services…”
Share
More from Hank Johnson
I’m not going to stand by and support an effort to dismantle our democracy through the budgeting process.
I am stunned that co-Presidents Musk and Trump are firing over 500 FAA employees, including those maintaining radar systems and landing equipment, when aviation safety is already at risk.
We have seen this movie before, and it did not end well. On the Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet Subcommittee where I am ranking member, we have discussed with real concern economic espionage and theft of trade secrets by…
The same way that the people of America have the opportunity to correct this mistake that we made in electing Donald Trump, who unfortunately got manipulated into war by Benjamin Netanyahu.





