Mr. Chairman, in response, I would point out that with respect to interrelated regulations, different regulatory authorities have different regulatory objectives. And so, to require that one agency survey the other to see whether or not there are any similar or the same objectives, with no power or authority to decide to do away with a particular regulation, based on an objective that is no longer suitable, I think, is not something that this amendment allows for; and it's also something that agencies themselves are not equipped to do. I agree that we need to have some mechanism whereby regulatory regulations can be looked at, modified, strengthened or weakened or done away with at any particular time. But this anti-regulatory legislation and this amendment will not accomplish that. I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Hank Johnson
Congress is poised to spend less next Fiscal Year on Federal prison infrastructure even as a Federal watchdog reported this year...
Experts agree that dangerous speech from elected officials creates a climate that foments violence and threatens public safety.
It's ironic that we're holding this hearing today about censorship and speech on campus, but last night, MAGA Republicans and others censured the only Palestinian voice in the House of Representatives because they didn't like what she had…
Mr. Chair, we have seen this movie before, and it did not end well. On the Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet Subcommittee where I am ranking member, we have discussed with real concern economic espionage and theft of trade…





