This amendment is not about timber harvesting in the national forests. It does not prevent it. And it does not prevent the construction of new roads in the national forests for purposes of timber access. What it does is to eliminate a costly taxpayer subsidy that is part of the Forest Service program, a subsidy that has been roundly denounced, and correctly so, by virtually every taxpayer group in America, such as Citizens Against Government Waste and Taxpayers for Common Sense, because it cannot be justified. Second, this is an important environmental vote, perhaps our most important environmental vote to date because we reduce by $10 million an amount of money that is appropriated for new road construction in the national forests. The amendment does absolutely nothing to reduce or to impede the accounts that are provided for in the maintenance of roads in the National Park System. So Mr. President, I urge support of the Bryan amendment because it is truth in budgeting and makes sense from a fiscal point of view and because environmentally it is sound policy for the Nation.
William Bryan: “This amendment is not about timber harvesting in the national forests. It does not prevent it. And it does not prevent…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to eliminate a taxpayer subsidy related to the Forest Service program.
Share
More from William Bryan
I want to make a point one more time on the issue of transportation. This has often been characterized as an issue of Nevada versus the entire country. As more and more people around the country are aware of the implications for their…
Again, let me urge the NBA and the Philadelphia 76ers to step forward and be heard. They will say: Look, we cannot control Mr. Iverson's conduct. That may be true. But they have an obligation, a responsibility to speak out and to condemn…
finally, let me conclude by saying that the administration has indicated the President may veto this legislation because of the heavy tilt toward managed care plans, the lack of accountability, and the lack of provisions that would…
That is, as the Senator from California knows, an argument that has been raised. It is a specious argument. The Senator from California hails from a jurisdiction which has been on the cutting edge of so much of the technology of the…





