Is the Senator indicating that an investor who files in a State court in a timely fashion after having consulted with legal counsel that said, yes, this is a timely action--and we shall assume for the sake of the discussion meritorious--can have his action, in effect, dismissed by having it removed to the Federal court and the shorter statute of limitations of 1 to 3 years as is required under Federal law?
Questioning the implications of federal law on state court actions during a legislative discussion.
Share
More from William Bryan
Do I understand the thrust of the Senator's argument is not to advocate some new standards for CAFE but simply to permit those who are charged with that responsibility to make a basic inquiry as to whether or not there is room, based upon…
This legislation would plunge the dagger into the back of Nevada's principal industry and would accomplish no useful purpose. Ninety-eight percent of the sports betting in America is conducted illegally outside of the State of Nevada…
Burn down your cities and leave our farms, and your cities will spring up again as if by magic, but destroy our farms and the grass will grow in the streets of every city in the country.
I wish to respond to the gracious statement by the chairman of the Energy Committee. Although we have had strong differences on this issue, the differences have been professional, not personal. He has been very professional in the way in…
Other voices in this conversation
