Political Quotes

William Bryan: much has been said over the past few hours today and earlier during the course of our discussion of S. 1936 about what I…

On the recordJuly 31, 1996
much has been said over the past few hours today and earlier during the course of our discussion of S. 1936 about what I consider one of the most serious defects of this piece of legislation in that it emasculates the environmental protections that have been drafted for more than a quarter of a century, most of which with bipartisan support and in effect says with respect to this particular issue they shall not apply. So what we are doing is we are giving people an opportunity, our colleagues an opportunity, to express themselves on the environmental issue, very, very simple. The first part of this amendment says: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Secretary shall comply with all Federal laws and regulations in developing and implementing the integrated management system. My colleagues will recall the section 501 under the current provisions, as amended, is very convoluted and says: If the requirements of any Federal, State, or local law (including a requirement imposed by regulation or by any other means under such a law) are inconsistent with or duplicative of the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act . . . or of this Act, the Secretary shall comply only with the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and of this Act. . . . This Mr. President, makes it very, very clear. If you do not want all of these environmental laws preempted, this is the way to correct it.
Said by
William Bryan
Florida

Editor's note · Context

Discussing environmental protections in relation to S. 1936 during Senate debate.

Share

More from William Bryan

May 2, 2000

This is not about science. This is about politics, as he reminds us. Because the time is short, I will respond to some of the issues that have been raised. First of all, we have heard many paeans to the nuclear power industry. Whether you…

govinfo.gov
Jul 17, 2000

I am not sure I would agree with the Senator from Idaho. Clearly, the hazardous fuels reduction program, in which we have provided, as you pointed out, 120 million additional dollars, would be the program that would address that issue, in…

govinfo.gov
Oct 18, 2000

finally, let me conclude by saying that the administration has indicated the President may veto this legislation because of the heavy tilt toward managed care plans, the lack of accountability, and the lack of provisions that would…

govinfo.gov
Feb 10, 2000

I wish to respond to the gracious statement by the chairman of the Energy Committee. Although we have had strong differences on this issue, the differences have been professional, not personal. He has been very professional in the way in…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation