I am pleased to be joining with Senator Pressler as a cosponsor on this amendment to provide States the option to use the IRS Federal income tax refund intercept process to try to recapture AFDC-type benefit overpayments. Some years ago, Congress provided for an IRS Federal income tax intercept process to be used to help retrieve child support payment arrearages. When an individual is in arrears on his or her child support payments, the IRS refund intercept allows the State to notify the IRS of the arrearage. If the individual is to receive a Federal income tax refund, the IRS can intercept the refund. Rather than having the tax refund go directly to the individual, the refund amount is intercepted and paid toward the child support arrearage. As I know a number of my colleagues have also done in their home States, I have spent significant time this year visiting welfare offices in both northern and southern Nevada. During those visits, I spent a significant amount of time listening to welfare eligibility workers. It surprised me to learn from these eligibility workers that State welfare agencies did not have the authority to notify the IRS to intercept Federal income tax refunds to try to recapture benefit overpayments for AFDC-type cash assistance.
William Bryan: “I am pleased to be joining with Senator Pressler as a cosponsor on this amendment to provide States the option to use…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to allow states to intercept tax refunds for recapturing welfare benefit overpayments.
Share
More from William Bryan
may I inquire further of the distinguished Senator, my friend from Washington, with another question. Has the Senator had an opportunity to see this morning's issue of Congress Daily? On the back, there is an ad designed to uphold the…
within the next few days, I will cast my last vote as a U.S. Senator, and by the end of this year, I will conclude 36 years of public experience. Permit me to reflect for a moment on this experience and share with you some observations…
I must say I have difficulty following the arguments of my friend from Idaho. First, I have no objection to--in fact, I am very supportive of it--the amendment offered by Senator Domenici last week. That has to do with hazardous fuels…
EPA has proposed a standard of 15 millirems, consistent with what was done in New Mexico. S. 1287, in its original form, doubled this. We are debating this issue today because the nuclear utilities do not want the 15-millirem standard…





