Mr. President, for those who are not familiar with the parliamentary intricacies of the Senate process, I think a reasonable question should be raised, and that is why are we debating this issue; namely, the placement of a temporary nuclear waste dump at the Nevada test site in Nevada, when, No. 1, the Speaker of the House has indicated that no such legislation will be processed in the House; and, No. 2, the President of the United States has said if any such legislation should reach his desk, he will veto it.
William Bryan: “Mr. President, for those who are not familiar with the parliamentary intricacies of the Senate process, I think a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the debate over a temporary nuclear waste dump at the Nevada test site.
Share
More from William Bryan
Whether you live in Maine or California or Washington State or Florida or, as I do, the great State of Nevada--and which I am privileged to represent--people are talking about the price of prescription drugs. The reason for that is that…
How does closing the only lab entirely focused on preparing and protecting first responders against threats of terrorism make any sense?
This is not about science. This is about politics, as he reminds us. Because the time is short, I will respond to some of the issues that have been raised. First of all, we have heard many paeans to the nuclear power industry. Whether you…
if I may respond to the excessively generous comments of my chairman, my colleague, and my friend, the reality is that working with him has been a pleasure. Without his cooperation and, obviously, trying to work in a bipartisan way to…





