I simply say, not to be argumentative with the chairman, but if the utilities had elected not to make that payment--one would assume they are acting in their own self-interest--this will now compel them to make the payment before they have the benefit of the interim or permanent storage. That is the only point I sought to make.
William Bryan: “I simply say, not to be argumentative with the chairman, but if the utilities had elected not to make that payment--one…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing utility payments related to interim or permanent storage.
Share
More from William Bryan
When one looks at the totality of problems, they are tall: Runoff, the erosion control, and the declining clarity. These are the primary, but not the exclusive, problems in the basin. The appropriators removed $11.3 million from the road…
Do I understand the thrust of the Senator's argument is not to advocate some new standards for CAFE but simply to permit those who are charged with that responsibility to make a basic inquiry as to whether or not there is room, based upon…
It strikes the Senator from Nevada that the argument the Senator is making is a win-win. It is a win for the consumer, for the environment, and in terms of the trade imbalance we currently face in this country. Would the Senator not agree…
there are no maps. That will give you some indication of what a shoddy, moving target this has been as we have tried to debate and expand on it. It is simply indefensible public policy. I urge my colleagues to vote against it.





