Well, I have some sure thought, and then I know the gentleman has some other Members here that are really passionate about how offensive it is about what is happening to Miguel Estrada. But I will tell you this: There is a double standard. Miguel Estrada would be the first Hispanic ever on this bench. He is a Solicitor General not in just the Republican administration, but he worked for President Clinton's administration. He got high marks everywhere he worked. The problem is this. The critics of Miguel Estrada do not want a vote. They do not want a debate over his talents, his capabilities, his integrity, his morals, his academic achievements; and they especially do not want to discuss the fact that this wonderful gentleman came here as a 17-year-old, lived the American dream, and now is an outstanding American statesman. They cannot vote against a man if they have to live with a description of his incredible achievements. So what the critics are using is all sorts of excuses. And as the gentleman points out, they have never ever once demanded that any of the nominees in the past live up to the technical requirements that they are trying to place on him. The double standard the gentleman speaks about, in my view, is because Mr. Estrada is a lesson to Americans that you do not have to think, just because you are a Hispanic American, in a one-little-box mentality. You do not have to be a liberal activist.
Tom Feeney: “Well, I have some sure thought, and then I know the gentleman has some other Members here that are really passionate…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination of Miguel Estrada and perceived double standards in the confirmation process.
Share
More from Tom Feeney
I was one of the outspoken critics, even of Republican earmarks like the Bridge to Nowhere. But I have to tell you, you have got to give credit where credit is due, when they will stand up and say, we are not going to have earmarks. I…
this amendment is a sense of the Congress provision stating the U.S. should seek to obtain commitments for cooperation from other nations in the search for near-Earth objects. Mr. Rohrabacher has been an ardent advocate in our committee…
I too want to thank Congressman Flake and the cosponsors of this amendment. Our friends on the Democratic side have two arguments. Number 1, they say this is a superfluous, it's a red herring because nobody's talking about it. But we've…
I would ask him: Is it true or is it not true that America's market share of capital formation and capital control has declined since Sarbanes-Oxley has been enacted?





