It is not just the fact that Miguel Estrada, if the critics have their way, will be denied the opportunity to be the first Hispanic ever to serve on that great court but it is the way it is happening. There have been several committee hearings. Normally judges at this level receive at most one or two committee hearings. They have had many more than that. But with respect to the problem and the issues they have had, they have been unable to identify any sin that this man is guilty of, either philosophically, with respect to his integrity, his background, his impeccable qualifications. And so what they have engaged in, the critics of this great man, is a whispering campaign. And they are trying, not to vote down the nominee, what they are suggesting, these critics, is that we will not have a vote at all. And after all, if the real reason you are sabotaging the opportunity for Miguel Estrada to go to the bench is not something you will admit in public, then do not have a vote. If it is something that you are willing to stand up with honor and respect in debate in a free forum in front of the entire world, then go into debate and have that vote. That is the democratic process.
Tom Feeney: “It is not just the fact that Miguel Estrada, if the critics have their way, will be denied the opportunity to be the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination of Miguel Estrada to the court and the opposition he faced.
Share
More from Tom Feeney
Reclaiming my time, I should point out that the minority happily worked on a manager's amendment, where we enthusiastically endorsed the concept that the administrator ought to contract with external organizations to facilitate new…
I do not rise in opposition to the amendment. I should say I have no objection to the amendment. I have read it very carefully, and I appreciate the language 'when appropriate.' Of course, it would be the United States that determined, in…
I'm honored to speak today in support of H. Res. 942, recognizing the significance of Black History Month... The achievements of so many have encouraged today's youth to strive for a more equal and free country.
not only am I not in opposition, but I wholeheartedly and enthusiastically endorse the Harman-Ehlers amendment. And I should point out as she mentions the trouble in getting new people into the workforce and an aging and retiring…





