Mr. Speaker, it is obvious that many of the proponents of this proposal have not even read it, for if they had, they would discover to their chagrin that it only limits the Congress in enacting income tax rate increases, not tax increases. You know what that will do: Merely transfer the tax increases over to other kind of taxes where the people that are worried about the income tax rates will be protected. But this is unconstitutional. There is no way that a simple majority of this House can adopt a rule here tonight and bind the rest of the House to require a 60 percent vote on any other thing.
Sam Gibbons: “Mr. Speaker, it is obvious that many of the proponents of this proposal have not even read it, for if they had, they…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a proposal limiting Congress's ability to enact income tax rate increases.
Share
More from Sam Gibbons
Mr. Speaker, Senate 1466 accelerates the process of conveying public land in Alaska under the Native Allotment Act of 1906, the Alaska Statehood Act of 1958, and the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971. Ninety million acres of…
I rise today in support and urge my colleagues to support H.R. 1092, the Nevada National Forest Disposal Act. This piece of legislation is important to the people of the State of Nevada, and as a lifelong resident of the great State, where…
While I remain very supportive of this legislation and do support its adoption, Mr. Speaker, I believe it is important to remember that we are preserving buildings and structures that bring up uneasy memories for many who live today in…
on rollcall No. 504 I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea.''





