Mr. Speaker, it is obvious that many of the proponents of this proposal have not even read it, for if they had, they would discover to their chagrin that it only limits the Congress in enacting income tax rate increases, not tax increases. You know what that will do: Merely transfer the tax increases over to other kind of taxes where the people that are worried about the income tax rates will be protected. But this is unconstitutional. There is no way that a simple majority of this House can adopt a rule here tonight and bind the rest of the House to require a 60 percent vote on any other thing.
Sam Gibbons: “Mr. Speaker, it is obvious that many of the proponents of this proposal have not even read it, for if they had, they…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a proposal limiting Congress's ability to enact income tax rate increases.
Share
More from Sam Gibbons
This week we are going to bring up the elimination of the sunset clause for the marriage penalty tax. Mr. Speaker, 120,000 individuals in my State, 60,000 married couples, are affected by this tax. If we allow this tax to come back, to…
Our Nation continues to mourn the many, many innocent citizens that were lost in the tragic events of September 11 and terrorist events since then. However, our Nation also celebrates the courage and dedication of the firefighters, police…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 1284 introduced by the gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Napolitano) increases the authorized Federal cost ceiling for the San Gabriel Demonstration Project by $12.5 million. The bill, as amended, reduces the Federal…
H.R. 4656 authorizes the U.S. Forest Service to convey 8.7 acres of land in Washoe County, Nevada at fair market value for the limited use as an elementary school. It also requires the proceeds from the sale to be used to purchase…





