Political Quotes

Richard B. Nugent: By direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 312 and ask for its immediate consideration. The…

On the recordJuly 23, 2013
By direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 312 and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 312 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2397) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read through page 157, line 2. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. (b) No amendment shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, the amendment described in section 2 of this resolution, and amendments en bloc described in section 3 of this resolution.…
Said by
Richard B. Nugent
Florida
Source
govinfo.gov
Jul 23, 2013

Share

More from Richard B. Nugent

Jun 10, 2015

I absolutely appreciate the chairman doing that and would love to work with him.

govinfo.gov
Dec 4, 2014

House Resolution 770 provides for the consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2015. It also allows for the consideration of the Executive Amnesty Prevention Act and for the California Emergency Drought…

govinfo.gov
Apr 13, 2015

This is a decision that essentially takes the 'air' out of 'airborne.'

congress.gov
Feb 24, 2015

How are we protecting ourselves against an insider attack that could obviously cripple us if that information got out to our adversaries?

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation