I thank Mr. McCaul for yielding me 1 minute. Mr. Chairman, I understand the opposition to this amendment is based on a misconception that it expands eligibility for surplus military equipment to include border security. Customs and Border Protection is already authorized to receive this equipment. It would just elevate their priority to where Justice Department is in allowing them to receive the equipment that they need. I was a sheriff in a 1033 program that provided equipment as it would exactly to Customs and Border Protection. It does not--it does not-- provide armed drones. Everything that they receive is demilitarized in regard to the fact they aren't receiving tanks, no military equipment that fires a rocket, or given rockets. That is a misconception that others have tried to move forward. Mr. Chairman, border security activities are the front lines of counternarcotics and counterterrorism before those threats hit American airspace, American waters, and American soil, and I support this amendment.
Share
More from Richard B. Nugent
I certainly do appreciate the ranking member's comments about other Federal employees, and I am the last one to malign Federal employees, but this is specifically in regard to--do you remember back when we passed the Pay Our Military Act…
I thank the gentleman for his consideration. What I would like to add to this is that the Air Force tested CHAMP on that delivery vehicle--a successful test, as it may be--and the testimony from those combatant commanders, the guys in the…
I continue to reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McGOVERN. May I inquire of the gentleman as to how many more speakers he has.
H. Res. 628 provides for the consideration of H.R. 4870, the Department of Defense Appropriation Act for FY 2015 under a modified open rule. This resolution will give Members on both sides of the aisle the opportunity to offer as many…





