Mr. Chairman, in an effort to finetune the bill before us, we are offering our amendment to address three specific concerns raised about H.R. 1675. Frankly, these are concerns raised by some who may oppose the bill altogether. However, it has been our approach to sit down with the interested parties, roll up our sleeves and attempt to solve the problems with the legislation in a reasonable and workable manner. Many Members and their staff have spent hours working out the details of this amendment, and we are grateful for the cooperation shown by Chairman Young and Saxton in getting to this point. Mr. Chairman, the heart of our amendment addresses three issues: First, what is the role of the hunting, fishing, and wildlife observation in the refuge system? Second, how much freedom should the Fish and Wildlife Service have in establishing--and expanding--refuges without congressional approval? And third, what safeguards exist to ensure that the management standards of existing refuges are maintained if the management authority is put in the hands of an individual State? In my remarks during the rule, I mentioned the legacy of J.N. ``Ding'' Darling--a hunter who was a steadfast conservationist. He understood that given the proper balance, hunting and conservation were compatible.
Porter Goss: “Mr. Chairman, in an effort to finetune the bill before us, we are offering our amendment to address three specific…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments to H.R. 1675 related to wildlife refuge management and conservation.
Share
More from Porter Goss
I would like to report back to you that I believe the agency is on a very even keel. Sailing well.
I wish that the bipartisanship that has been talked about would have been manifested in the vote that we all cast around here to send our troops the money that they need to do the job that they are doing. It is great to talk about…
I want to respond just to my good friend the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Dicks) by giving you a statement that we just received from the Director of Central Intelligence. I just saw it. I read it a minute ago. "The damage done by…
There is no question about one thing and that is that MTOPS is no longer a viable template to use as the decision-driver to control exports of high-performance computers. We, I think, all agree on that. We have economic and security…





