Last week by nearly a 5-to-1 margin the House voted against the only specific plan for a balanced budget within the next 5 years--without touching Social Security and without raising taxes. Only 73 of us were willing to bite the bullet and vote for a list of more than 500 specific cuts totaling $600 billion in savings. Still opponents of a balanced budget amendment argue passionately that a balanced budget measure is unnecessary because all we need to do is find the courage to make tough choices. If the 342-73 vote on the Solomon balanced budget amendment last week proved anything, it proved that such courage does not exist in this House. Clearly it is time for a balanced budget constitutional amendment; we will not eliminate our staggering and ever-growing national debt without it. I do not like having to amend the Constitution--but I like bankrupting the Nation even less. If you are in doubt, ask your children and grandchildren how they feel about it.
Porter Goss: “Last week by nearly a 5-to-1 margin the House voted against the only specific plan for a balanced budget within the next…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a balanced budget amendment during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Porter Goss
Without his good influence, today's House of Representatives appears diminished.
I want to respond just to my good friend the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Dicks) by giving you a statement that we just received from the Director of Central Intelligence. I just saw it. I read it a minute ago. "The damage done by…
Mr. Speaker, we have always known that the war on terrorism was going to be lengthy and difficult. President Bush told us that from the very beginning. Americans everywhere have girded up for a sustained conflict across the globe, around…
Mr. Chairman, we are living in a world that we all know has been transformed very dramatically by the threat of rogue states, terrorist organizations, and Lord knows we are definitely aware of it today. There are new costs involved in…





