I guess I would finish this by saying that humanitarian an emergency feeding programs, which are the type the gentleman are talking about, that come under title III, are going to remain not only fully funded, but probably enhanced under this amendment. We are going to get more money where the need is doing it this way than we are by just maintaining the status quo of a program that has already been cut, because, frankly, it is not doing the job it should be doing, and, frankly, it has got some problems. Consequently, they have cut some money. I merely suggested we got a good first step, why not take the rest of the stem and get rid of title III, and do it right through titles I and II and get the job done well. I think the consequence is we end up taking care of more serious needs than not. My motive is none other than that.
Porter Goss: “I guess I would finish this by saying that humanitarian an emergency feeding programs, which are the type the gentleman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for humanitarian emergency feeding programs during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Porter Goss
I am obviously here to join my colleagues in honoring the memory of those who died in the terrorist attacks of a year ago this day and to underscore with gratitude the amazing valor displayed by them. I am sure every American remembers…
this funding is real money that will bring real relief to the people in Florida who have been devastated by Hurricanes Charley and Frances and who need help. As Governor Bush said to us, we have developed a case, perhaps, of ``hurricane…
I did not make any comment or hold up this quote from the Congressional Record that indicates that Senator Kerry had doubts about intelligence to be combative or confrontational or to be insensitive or to in any way offend my colleagues on…





