Political Quotes

Neal Dunn: on behalf of the seniors and near seniors in the Congressional district that I represent, I rise today in enthusiastic…

On the recordMarch 1, 2000
on behalf of the seniors and near seniors in the Congressional district that I represent, I rise today in enthusiastic support of H.R. 5, the Seniors Citizens' Freedom to Work Act. The Social Security earnings limit is another aspect of a 60-year old Social Security system that no longer applies to modern society. These days seniors are living longer. They are healthier, and yet too many of our Nation's best workers are sitting in rocking chairs. We need their strength. We need their experience in our communities. And young people starting new jobs need their example, their example of the value of work and the discipline of work. Unfortunately, by denying retirement benefits for those who choose to work, Social Security penalizes seniors who want to be productive and teach the values of hard work to younger generations. Mr. Speaker, this bill is also very important to women who, 75 percent of the time, live longer than their spouses. And they ought to be able to have the peace of mind that they can supplement their retirement earnings if they wish without being penalized. In Washington State alone, more than 13,000 seniors have been forced to choose between keeping the job they love or losing the retirement income for which they worked all their lives. This is wrong. It also keeps an intelligent and productive part of our work force at home.
Said by
Neal Dunn
Republican · Florida

Editor's note · Context

Supporting the Seniors Citizens' Freedom to Work Act and addressing Social Security earnings limits for seniors.

Share

More from Neal Dunn

Mar 28, 2023

the patchwork regulatory system for the NIL licenses is simply not working.

congress.gov
Mar 9, 2023

Absolutely not. What we should do is have a coherent process that, when a decision is made, that the decision sticks.

congress.gov
Sep 13, 2023

I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 386 and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 387. PERSONAL EXPLANATION

govinfo.gov
Apr 18, 2023

I certainly agree with the need for resilient infrastructure, and I encourage all of my colleagues to support this legislation.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation