Mr. Speaker, when the Committee on Rules met yesterday afternoon to consider this rule, I made two points I feel are worth repeating here for the benefit of all Members of the House. The first point relates directly to the consideration of the ban on assault weapons. In the 103d Congress, I believe a serious error was made when the House was not given the opportunity to take a final up or down vote on this issue. Given the controversy surrounding issues relating to gun ownership, these issues should be addressed directly, not buried in other legislative proposals, as was the assault weapon ban in 1994. Consequently, the desire of a great many Members to have a direct vote on this issue is understandable. However, it is how we are getting to this direct vote that I find peculiar and out of the ordinary.
Maxwell Frost: “Mr. Speaker, when the Committee on Rules met yesterday afternoon to consider this rule, I made two points I feel are…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a direct vote on the ban of assault weapons during House debate.
Share
More from Maxwell Frost
This is one of many amendments I have come to debate this Congress where it seems like it was just written by the gun industry and the gun manufacturers. It is disappointing. When gun violence happens, it doesn't matter if you are a…
The House GOP just voted to give ICE and CBP $70 BILLION. Instead of investing in you and ensuring you can afford your healthcare, groceries, or rent—they chose to hand $70 BILLION to agencies operating without any guardrails while…
A vote in favor of this measure provides stability to families for communities and critical parts of our workforce. A vote against it sends people into conditions that we know are unsafe. This work does not end here. We hope that in the…





