Political Quotes

On the recordDecember 3, 2015
``premium stabilization'' is a fancy term for bailout. What this basically seeks to strike out is a provision that takes out the money for a bailout fund, for taxpayer money that would be used to bail out insurance companies that participate in ObamaCare. Why should the American taxpayer have to bail out private insurance companies that are losing money on ObamaCare? Last year, because we passed this provision, we saved the American taxpayers $2.5 billion. But now, because these companies have lobbyists who come up here and lobby to get their money, we are supposed to leave in this fund to bail out private insurance companies. This is outrageous. If you want to be involved in the exchanges--and of course I want us to repeal the whole lot, but if you want to be involved in these exchanges and you lose money, the American taxpayer should not have to bail you out to the tune of over $2 billion, and that is what they are asking for. Mr. President, pursuant to section 904 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and the waiver provisions of applicable budget resolutions, I move to waive all applicable sections of that act and applicable budget resolutions for purposes of amendment No. 2916, and I ask for the yeas and nays. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second? There appears to be a sufficient second. The question is on agreeing to the motion. The clerk will call the roll. The bill clerk called the roll.
Said by
Marco Rubio
Republican · Florida

Share

More from Marco Rubio

Jul 24, 2026

I’m not going to opine on something that’s still working through a legal process.

thebulwark.com
Jul 24, 2026

Those need to be managed very carefully, because obviously, a conflict — be it economic or otherwise — between the U.S. and China would have a dramatic global impact.

npr.org
Jul 23, 2026

The Communist Cuban regime continues to pose a deep multifaceted threat to U.S. national security and hemispheric stability.

foreignpolicy.com
Jul 24, 2026

The only regret we were going to have is if Iran ever had a nuclear weapon, and that’s what they were aiming to have.

state.gov

Other voices in this conversation