Is it not true that if this language would have been in the bill, that there's no guarantee that somebody would have not done an amendment in the Rules Committee to take it out, so that there is no more different guarantee if it was in than if it was out? Is that not true? The CHAIR. The gentleman has not stated a proper parliamentary inquiry. That is a matter for debate.
Share
More from Lincoln Diaz-Balart
I was unable to vote today as I had an immovable commitment. Had I been present, I would have voted NAY on Roll Call No. 32, Trahan Amendment to H.R. 27 and YEA on Roll Call No. 33, H.R. 27. Personal Explanation Mr. DeSAULNIER. Mr…
I would remind everyone that before we can fund anything else Ukraine, we have to start by funding the government of the United States of America. We have been on the floor for a while now, and let me just boil it down to this, if I may…
Oh, so many words. Allow me, Mr. Speaker, to cut to the chase. We have a choice right now. Vote ``yes'' to keep the Federal Government open, to control inflation-causing overspending, and to secure the southern border. That is a ``yes''…
I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Speaker, I think it is important to note here that, first of all, I am very interested that there was a rereading of the bill as it came from the House and from the Senate and that there…
Other voices in this conversation
