I ask my colleagues to reject the Democrat leadership bill, among other reasons because it discriminates against American citizens who are naturalized if they have not been citizens of the United States for 5 years. It creates a category of second-class American citizens, and we should not be creating second-class citizens in this body. We should reject that bill. They try to do it surreptitiously. They try to hide their discrimination, but it is discrimination nonetheless. If we go to page 29 of their bill, they do not call it citizen. They say one has to be a national of the United States. Then they go to a section of the law, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22), for at least 5 years. Let us go to that law. A person has to either be a citizen of the United States, or they have to be a person who, though not a citizen, owes permanent allegiance. What does that mean? I quote from the case that defined that statute: ``Status as a national of the United States owing permanent allegiance can be created only by legislative or other action of the Federal Government that is not acquired by mere assertion of allegiance.'' So citizenship for 5 years, surreptitiously brought before this House, is what that law does, and they want us to create a second class citizenship tier in this country. Do not discriminate against citizens by nationalization. Reject the Democrat leadership bill and let us get on and vote for a decent piece of legislation this evening.
Lincoln Diaz-Balart: “I ask my colleagues to reject the Democrat leadership bill, among other reasons because it discriminates against…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a Democrat leadership bill that discriminates against naturalized American citizens.
Share
More from Lincoln Diaz-Balart
As the designee of the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Granger), I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Florida is recognized for 5 minutes.
I would remind everyone that before we can fund anything else Ukraine, we have to start by funding the government of the United States of America. We have been on the floor for a while now, and let me just boil it down to this, if I may…
I revere his service to the country. We must always thank those who served, and he served honorably. On this amendment, the bill that we are debating right now substantially reduces spending, while strengthening our national security. Part…
I was unable to vote today as the last vote timed out. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 17, H.R. 30; Preventing Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act. Personal Explanation





