I am not speaking against anyone, but it is extremely important that, for principle's sake, that I say that if we want these new programs, worthy as they are, then we should appropriate new funds for them. When we get into presently persistent programs that are set aside for low- and minority-income people, then we begin to find the kind of bifurcation we are finding here today: other groups are going to be coming up and ask for the same thing. I am compelled to say to the chairman that even though the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Coburn) and I never agree on anything, in terms of the expansion of this program, he is right in that we must remember these set-asides that we bring into the HOME program in the long run will cause us problems.
Kendrick Meek: “I am not speaking against anyone, but it is extremely important that, for principle's sake, that I say that if we want…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for new programs and the implications of set-asides in the HOME program.
Share
More from Kendrick Meek
I rise in strong and unwavering support for H. Con. Res. 198 and am pleased to be a co-sponsor on this Congressional Resolution that draws attention to the approximately 37 million Americans who live in poverty. In particular, I am bound…
The point I'm trying to make here is that we even have numbers for Afghanistan and what is happening there, and we just had an Armed Services meeting a little earlier today, and there is discussion. One of the witnesses, a lieutenant…
Families that know what it means to punch in and punch out every day, some individuals that are really struggling in rural Florida, they need that tax credit, they need that assistance.
Thank you so very much, Ms. Moore. And I can tell you anytime we get a chance to come to the floor and honor our patriots is always a day that the Congress should yield and pay respect to not only that individual but also the family. Madam…





