Madam Chair, I thank the gentleman for yielding. Madam Chair, the CDBG program is one of the few opportunities that the Federal Government has where we actually take taxpayer dollars and send them back to the State and local governments to use the way they see fit. That is the reason I rise in opposition to this amendment. This will cut $13 million just from the State of Florida and a little over $4 million just from my district alone. Madam Chair, having been in local government as a sheriff for 12 years, I can say that CDBG was a tremendous opportunity to help public safety in the way that our community needed assistance. It wasn't a mandate down from bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. It was an opportunity to take tax dollars, return them to the taxpayer, and allow their elected representatives to decide how best to use that money. For that reason, I am opposed to the gentleman's amendment, and I ask all my colleagues to vote ``no.''
On the recordNovember 7, 2023
Share & report
More from John Rutherford
Apr 29, 2024
In fact, Mr. Secretary, federal statute expressly prohibits NHTSA from considering the fuel economy of EVs when determining maximum feasible cafe standards for passenger cars and trucks.
Apr 12, 2024
Mr. Chair, I thank the gentleman from Ohio for yielding. Mr. Chair, I rise today in strong support of this bill and equally strong opposition to the amendment. Simply put, this amendment ties the hands of our intelligence community, making…
May 16, 2024
Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend for yielding time. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act. This LEOSA Reform Act will expand the ability of qualified officers, whether active, retired, or no longer…





