It was sort of a bait-and-switch project because the train that they were looking at was only--it was 84 miles.
John Mica: “It was sort of a bait-and-switch project because the train that they were looking at was only--it was 84 miles.”
On the recordJuly 13, 2016
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Mica criticizes the proposed train project for not being truly high-speed.
Share
More from John Mica
Sep 27, 2016
I think it will save money and actually benefit projects that start with non-Federal dollars and can be a great advantage to some of those ports and other waterways that are at a disadvantage because of the distance of the project. So I…
Dec 1, 2016
I assure you, Mr. Evans, it will have repercussions up here among your allies and your partners.
Sep 27, 2016
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of title I, add the following: SEC. 1__. ADJUSTMENT TO COST BENEFIT RATIO. For any navigation…





