Political Quotes

John Mica: I submit it is because special interests weighed in. Here are the folks that supported the legislation last time that…

On the recordOctober 24, 1997
I submit it is because special interests weighed in. Here are the folks that supported the legislation last time that have now reversed their position. Special interests have weighed in. I have a unique approach today. Let us not represent special interests. Let us represent the American taxpayer. We heard it is not costing us anything. Let me put this in perspective. For every time someone got on an Amtrak passenger train last year, the taxpayer paid $25, $25. There were 20 million boardings. That is hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. So it does cost the taxpayer money. In fact, it has cost the taxpayer, since 1971, $19 billion to subsidize Amtrak. Testimony to our committee said that we could transport people by chauffeured limousine along some of these routes at a lower cost. Why can we not make these changes? Because special interests say that if we eliminate a route, we must pay 6 years full wages and benefits. We have tried Band-Aids. We have tried bailing wire. We have tried masking tape. I submit that the taxpayer demands that we make real reforms that fix Amtrak.
Said by
John Mica
Republican · Florida

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the need for reforms in Amtrak funding and operations.

Share

More from John Mica

Sep 25, 2017

Fifteen years later, we see a system that has not complied with the laws that we have passed multiple times.

congress.gov
Sep 27, 2016

I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of title I, add the following: SEC. 1__. ADJUSTMENT TO COST BENEFIT RATIO. For any navigation…

govinfo.gov
Dec 1, 2016

I assure you, Mr. Evans, it will have repercussions up here among your allies and your partners.

congress.gov
Sep 8, 2016

We need to have templates for each type of disaster.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation