I rise in strong opposition to this closed rule to consider FAA reauthorization legislation. Quite frankly, I am disgusted with this whole process at a time when millions of Americans are without employment, people are having their homes foreclosed, people seeking jobs for more than a year now finding no opportunities, people cutting back across the land in tough economic times. I am really saddened that we continue to play games with one of our most important responsibilities, and that is providing Federal authorization for all of our aviation programs. The FAA bill sets the blueprint for our policy, Federal policy, for projects, for funding, for every activity dealing with aviation in this Nation. I am actually sickened by the games that have been played with this. As chairman of the Aviation Subcommittee, in May of 2003--now listen to this--in 2003, I introduced the current and longstanding last Federal Aviation Authorization bill. Now, I didn't get it done immediately; but by December, in 6 months I had that on the President's desk, and in December of 2007 the President signed that.
On the recordMarch 25, 2010
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
The speaker opposes the closed rule for FAA reauthorization legislation amid economic struggles.
Share
More from John Mica
Dec 1, 2016
Again, if you don't have communication, I mean, when they couldn't communicate--and we held funds up a couple of times. I think I participated in that to get your attention.
Sep 20, 2016
I mean, one way to bring the price down is to have competition. Wouldn't that be correct?
Sep 8, 2016
I think it was--the incident was the 11th. The 24th is--was that the date that you finalized the shelter-in-place program?
Sep 27, 2016
I think it will save money and actually benefit projects that start with non-Federal dollars and can be a great advantage to some of those ports and other waterways that are at a disadvantage because of the distance of the project. So I…





