Mr. Chairman, with respect to the point of order, we were told back in 1996 when the sugar program was developed and we authorized it that it was a no net-cost program; it will not cost the Government anything. We have already spent $54 million last month, and we are getting ready to spend $500 million more, so we were kind of misled in 1996 to have been told that it was a no net-cost program; so because of the change is the reason I think we should not have a point of order raised.
Jeff Miller: “Mr. Chairman, with respect to the point of order, we were told back in 1996 when the sugar program was developed and we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of the sugar program during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Jeff Miller
I would think that Sloane has the skills that's necessary. He has the demeanor that is needed in order to force a change.
I'm not going to have faith until we are absolutely sure every single veteran has gotten an appointment.
I will say this that I know the acting secretary is out and he is making some very positive changes, but the bureaucracy is still so big. There has to be accountability and people have to pay with their jobs and in some instances, there's…
We must work together to fix the unacceptable systemic problems in accessing VA healthcare and that the VA is taking action to accelerate, access to care reaching out to veterans.





