I understand that it was not just papers that were taken, but there possibly were bound books or folders of some type that you, in fact, could not just crunch up as a bunch of papers. You would know, in fact, that you were disposing of them; and you had to do it deliberately, if, in fact, you did dispose of it. So to say that it was sloppy and inadvertent kind of stretches the imagination. But, of course, a lot of this has been done in this House over recent months, unfortunately; and it is being done out on the campaign trail, so it is certainly to be expected.
Jeff Miller: “I understand that it was not just papers that were taken, but there possibly were bound books or folders of some type…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the deliberate disposal of documents in a political context.
Share
More from Jeff Miller
It's not going to solve the problem. I've said it for a long time that this is much larger than one man. Secretary Shinseki obviously has lost the ability to lead his agency. Nothing is going to change with the secretary being gone but…
No, it wasn't a clerical error, and I'll tell you one even worse than that. In Pittsburgh, where at least six veterans died from Legionnaire's disease because the water was contaminated and they knew for a year the director of the…
I will say this that I know the acting secretary is out and he is making some very positive changes, but the bureaucracy is still so big. There has to be accountability and people have to pay with their jobs and in some instances, there's…





