this amendment, the Miller- Miller amendment, is a modest and simple reform of the sugar program. It is not the elimination of the program. In 1996, we tried to eliminate the program, missed by 5 votes then, but we kind of are reluctant in this Congress to eliminate anything, especially in the agriculture program. So this is a modest one-cent change in sugar. That is right. We are only going to lower the price from 18 cents to 17 cents, a 5 percent reduction in the price of sugar, which amounts to a $500 million savings, according to the Congressional Budget Office, $500 million worth of savings over the next 10 years. This is a very bipartisan bill, as my colleagues will see from the vote on this particular amendment. Even the secretaries of agriculture from three different administrations have come out in favor of this amendment. Secretary Glickman, Secretary of Agriculture under President Clinton, Secretary Clayton Yeutter under President Bush, and Secretary Jack Block under President Reagan, have all come out and said the sugar program is no longer sustainable, we need to change it, and this amendment is a good step in the right direction. Let me briefly comment about what the sugar program is. Well, the sugar program is a Federal program where we maintain a very high price for sugar in the United States. In fact, sugar prices in the United States are two to three times world prices.…
Jeff Miller: “this amendment, the Miller- Miller amendment, is a modest and simple reform of the sugar program. It is not the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Miller-Miller amendment to reform the sugar program.
Share
More from Jeff Miller
Well, that's the president's decision. This is the choice that the president is making. Either you stick with the status quo or you bring somebody in that's going to shake up the system from the very bottom to the top.
And nobody was held accountable. That's why we've asked the question again today, with members of the South Carolina delegation and members of the Georgia delegation, tell us exactly who was disciplined and now.
Mr. Speaker, this is an outstanding bill. It was a true bipartisan effort. I appreciate the chairman of the committee, Mr. Michaud's, able leadership in bringing this bill to the floor. It does all of the things that our chairman had…
No, it wasn't a clerical error, and I'll tell you one even worse than that. In Pittsburgh, where at least six veterans died from Legionnaire's disease because the water was contaminated and they knew for a year the director of the…





