What we have at issue is the short-form versus the long-form data. The short form, as has been pointed out, was changed slightly from 1990; and when they gave examples, they did not mention Dominican. So it may possibly have affected the number. There is a question on the long form that asks ``place of birth.'' That data will not be available until 2003. So the problem on the short form is when they filled out the form, if they did not put Dominican, they do not get counted as Dominican. On the long form, if they put Dominican, they will get counted. 2003 will have a new report, but we cannot go back and change what people put down on the short form now.
Jeff Miller: “What we have at issue is the short-form versus the long-form data. The short form, as has been pointed out, was changed…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing issues related to census data collection and its impact on counting Dominican individuals.
Share
More from Jeff Miller
I would think that Sloane has the skills that's necessary. He has the demeanor that is needed in order to force a change.
It's not going to solve the problem. I've said it for a long time that this is much larger than one man. Secretary Shinseki obviously has lost the ability to lead his agency. Nothing is going to change with the secretary being gone but…
We must work together to fix the unacceptable systemic problems in accessing VA healthcare and that the VA is taking action to accelerate, access to care reaching out to veterans.
It's more than stunning and I would say that for somebody like this whistleblower to have been forced to make decisions that only medical providers should be making, to triage patients as to whether or not they should be put in a drawer is…





