It is amazing that we keep talking about sampling. The Supreme Court settled the issue. The issue of distribution of funds is not a constitutional question. We are talking about apportionment and redistricting. That is the constitutional question. That is what the Constitution mandates us to do in Article I of our Constitution, to do a full enumeration. That is what they are doing.
Jeff Miller: “It is amazing that we keep talking about sampling. The Supreme Court settled the issue. The issue of distribution of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the constitutional implications of apportionment and redistricting.
Share
More from Jeff Miller
I rise today to recognize Israel's right to defend itself and to express my desire for a peaceful and lasting resolution to the current conflict. In September of 2005, the Israeli government completed an evacuation of all Israeli citizens…
on America's birthday, North Korean leader Kim Jong Il thought it was wise to fire six ballistic missiles. The international community condemned these launches, and Kim Jong Il responded by firing an additional missile on July 5. Having…
I can tell you this, after what I heard today I am less convinced that the appropriate leadership is in place at the Department of Veterans Affairs.
It's more than stunning and I would say that for somebody like this whistleblower to have been forced to make decisions that only medical providers should be making, to triage patients as to whether or not they should be put in a drawer is…





