However, defunding plans clearly demonstrate their policy is to withdraw from the global war against Islamic militant extremists by surrendering to the enemy in Iraq. We are faced with two options in Iraq, Mr. Speaker, to move forward or to retreat. Some of my Democrat colleagues appear to be united in opposing any effort to adopt a more vigorous strategy in Iraq and, instead, are ready to retreat. This resolution is but the first step in that direction. Despite denials, the evidence is that the effort to cut the funding of our troops in Iraq and, in turn, for all of our efforts there are well underway. Several bills have already been introduced by Democrat Members to compel a withdrawal. Let me read the titles and the provisions. H.R. 508, to require the United States military disengagement from Iraq, which mandates a withdrawal of U.S. forces within 6 months of the enactment of this act and which cuts off funding for any deployment or continued deployment of forces in Iraq.
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen: “However, defunding plans clearly demonstrate their policy is to withdraw from the global war against Islamic militant…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of proposed funding cuts for U.S. troops in Iraq.
Share
More from Ileana Ros-Lehtinen
I do, however, strongly urge the administration to take it a step further and signal support for our DETER Act.
I am honored to commemorate the 60th anniversary of one of our top educational institutions in south Florida: Christopher Columbus High School. Since its inception in 1958, Christopher Columbus has graduated bright and talented young men…
I have an amendment to the preamble at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the amendment. The Clerk read as follows: Strike the preamble and insert the following: Whereas in 1982, 1984, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1993, 1994…
I am proud to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Poe), chairman of the Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade.





