We merely want to call a vote on an amendment which is very controversial, which asks U.S. taxpayers to fund a Castro investigation. We think there are better uses for the scarce resources of our Nation than to give credibility to a dictator's false accusations. The U.S. Department of State is not an agency of Fidel Castro. We should not treat it as such. Yet, that is what this amendment asks for, so we believe that there are better uses of taxpayer funds. We are not calling for 20-some-odd votes. The gentleman is the one, I would say to our colleague from New York, who is going to be doing that. We are merely calling for one vote, a roll-call vote, if it is demanded, if we lose on the voice vote; and that is, I think, fair, in the interests of democracy. We are not afraid of votes. We are not afraid of arguing the amendment on its merits. I think if we had had that opportunity at the appropriate time, I think we would not be in this situation now.
Editor's note · Context
Debating an amendment related to funding a Castro investigation during a House committee meeting.
Share
More from Ileana Ros-Lehtinen
I am so proud to rise today to recognize Ira Leesfield and congratulate him on receiving the 2018 Lawyers for Children America's Janet Reno Outstanding Community Partner Award. As a University of Florida Law School graduate, Ira proved…
On December 1, we commemorated World AIDS Day, celebrating our many accomplishments in the fight against HIV/AIDS around the globe. One important program for which we are also celebrating 15 years of success this year is PEPFAR. Mr…
This important resolution condemns the Maduro regime for its role in the deterioration of Venezuela's democratic institutions.
It's important to note Ranking Member Engel's BURMA Act, which still needs to be passed and that aims to impose additional sanctions.





