I appear here in somewhat of an ambivalent position because I feel the embargo should be lifted but I do not think it should be lifted unilaterally, and I have expressed my opinions in the past to the gentleman from Indiana [Mr. McCloskey], and my frustration of what is going on in this country. The Europeans told us 3 years ago that Yugoslavia was a European matter and that we should stay out of it. Then, when I went to the NATO conference 1/2 years ago, they said, ``Why aren't you invading?'' We cannot do this unless we are willing to assume the sole responsibility for the events in Bosnia, the United States. We cannot do this unless we are willing to abandon our European allies that are there. How can the President appear before the French Parliament and say, ``Please keep your forces there,'' and then the next day for us to unilaterally pull out from the embargo and go in there and jeopardize all these people's lives? We cannot do this unless we are willing to threaten the viability of international sanctions, as the chairman said, on Haiti, on Iraq, and in 2 weeks probably the President will go to the United Nations and say we should have an international embargo on North Korea, and they turn around and say, how can we unilaterally pull out of the sanctions on this country of Bosnia? You cannot do this unless you are willing to unilaterally remove yourself from leadership that brought us the gulf war victory.
Harry Johnston: “I appear here in somewhat of an ambivalent position because I feel the embargo should be lifted but I do not think it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of lifting the embargo on Bosnia during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Harry Johnston
until 2 weeks ago, in almost 20 years of public service, I had never filed a complaint against a colleague, even though I twice served on committees charged with investigating colleagues for ethical violations in the Florida State Senate…
I come before you mainly on the proposition of peacekeeping. I have been intimately involved in Africa the last 2 years. If this bill is passed, you would not have any such thing as Rwanda, where we went in under the U.N. umbrella…
I address this bill on two levels: No. 1, my interest in Africa; and, No. 2, just general foreign policy. First, the bill cuts back the development funds for Africa. There is $800 million for 600 million people, and now that is gone. Next…
It is not my intention in offering the amendment to imply any war power authorization for United States military force to act in Bosnia. This subsection of the amendment would only have the Congress advise the President that he should…





