Mr. Speaker, I really have to say that we should be embarrassed today to consider this legislation. Of all the pressing needs facing our country, the leadership has chosen to focus on this, the so-called Defense of Marriage Act. Defending our country against enemies is certainly important, as is defending our children against poverty and ignorance. Defending the elderly against neglect is important, as is defending our families against crime and criminals. But defending marriage? Get real. Defending marriage against what? Against whom? We are wasting precious time here. Mr. Speaker, this legislation denigrates the House of Representatives. What this bill lacks in substance and import, it makes up for in shameless politics. Demonizing Communist countries, welfare mothers, or immigrants is now old news. So the demon du jour is gays. I do not doubt the sincerity of those Americans who truly fear the notion of gay marriage. But the institution of marriage is not in jeopardy because some choose to associate with the benefits and the obligations of marriage. We as Members of Congress have a duty to educate, to enlighten, and push for a society that does not punish people because they are different. We are here to lead our constituents, not leave them behind.
Harry Johnston: “Mr. Speaker, I really have to say that we should be embarrassed today to consider this legislation. Of all the pressing…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the Defense of Marriage Act during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Harry Johnston
It is not my intention in offering the amendment to imply any war power authorization for United States military force to act in Bosnia. This subsection of the amendment would only have the Congress advise the President that he should…
I am concerned that the definition of environmental technology might be interpreted too broadly, specifically, that the definition might be used to encompass technologies developed by the Department of Energy. What is the Senator's…
I address this bill on two levels: No. 1, my interest in Africa; and, No. 2, just general foreign policy. First, the bill cuts back the development funds for Africa. There is $800 million for 600 million people, and now that is gone. Next…
I come before you mainly on the proposition of peacekeeping. I have been intimately involved in Africa the last 2 years. If this bill is passed, you would not have any such thing as Rwanda, where we went in under the U.N. umbrella…





